When was the colossal squid discovered? Separate discovery from first filming

Questions to keep separate

Question or feature	Explanation	What it does not establish
Formal naming	The species was named in 1925 from physical evidence. [1]	This is not a date for first filming or a biological-age claim.
Major Te Papa specimen	Caught in the Ross Sea in February 2007. [1]	The supplied record gives no exact day; distinguish this specimen from other collection labels.
Natural-habitat footage	A 30 cm juvenile was observed March 9, 2025, at 600 m near the South Sandwich Islands. [2]	Footage was announced April 15; dying adults had earlier been filmed by fishermen.

What “discovered” can mean

A species can be scientifically recognized before anyone films a living animal. Taxonomists can describe and name it from physical remains, comparing features that distinguish it from related species. The colossal squid was formally named in 1925, based on recovered material; early knowledge included remains found in sperm-whale stomachs. The naming year is therefore a taxonomic milestone, not the date a complete squid was first seen alive. [1]

A second kind of milestone is a substantial specimen that researchers can examine directly. Te Papa identifies its major specimen as caught in the Ross Sea in February 2007. That catch added a tangible animal for study, but it did not mark the species’ naming or its first confirmed natural-habitat footage. [1]

A four-point evidence timeline

Keep the records separate: 1925 is the formal naming year; February 2007 is the catch date for Te Papa’s major specimen; March 9, 2025 is the observation date for a juvenile near the South Sandwich Islands; and April 15, 2025 is the date that footage was announced publicly. The 2025 observation was at 600 metres in the South Atlantic, and specialists verified the animal’s arm hooks. [1] [2]

This timeline answers different questions. Ask “When was it named?” and the answer is 1925. Ask “When was Te Papa’s specimen caught?” and the answer is February 2007. Ask “When was a living juvenile filmed in its natural habitat?” and the answer is March 9, 2025; April 15 is the release date, not the sighting date. [1] [2]

Why the 2025 footage was a distinct first

The footage was described as the first confirmed footage of a colossal squid in its natural habitat. That wording matters: Schmidt Ocean Institute acknowledges that dying adults had previously been filmed by fishermen. So “first ever seen alive” overstates what the record supports. The 2025 observation documented a juvenile, about 30 centimetres long, at depth in the ocean rather than an animal filmed after being brought to the surface. [2]

The identification also rests on anatomy, not merely a striking appearance. Specialists verified hooks on the arms, a diagnostic feature used to distinguish the juvenile from a superficially similar glass squid. A short video can become useful scientific evidence when observers can inspect visible features and specialists can compare them with known anatomy. [2] [3]

Read specimen records precisely

Museum collections preserve material that can be examined and compared after the original discovery or catch. Te Papa’s collection information describes diagnostic hooks and specimens, while its 2007 specimen account specifies a Ross Sea catch in February. When comparing museum pages, identify the particular specimen: collection and exhibit summaries can use different specimen-year labels. The available evidence does not justify silently treating every year label as the same specimen or event. [1] [3]

A useful evidence-reading exercise is to label each date with its event before repeating it. “1925—named,” “February 2007—Te Papa specimen caught,” “March 9, 2025—juvenile observed,” and “April 15, 2025—footage announced” keep the chronology honest. No full day should be assigned to the 1925 description or the February 2007 catch from the information given. [1] [2]

Sources & further reading

Have a correction or a source to suggest? Send a note →